Except whereas Eyebite’s effect states the caster’s eyes change, SB doesn’t state anything about effecting the caster: it states an object is made. The spell description is way more akin to Creation or Illusory Dragon than Eyebite: there’s no descriptive text of affecting the caster.
By this argument, DM would likewise dispel those other spells if DM is cast on the caster (as opposed to the item).
Yes and no. As pointed out by others, “Self” actually has a definition that includes only affecting the caster, it’s just apparently also used specifically not in that way.
Except none of that is true, per the effect of the spell. You changing the spell to an Aura, doesn’t change what the spell says it does, which is it creates an object that exists even while dissipated.
The quote on Range: Self, is that it specifically only targets the caster.
The rules in my books state otherwise (in line with BB’s quote, I believe).
Is this a rule or your own design? I couldn’t find an Errata stating anything like this.
Which would very much mean it doesn’t follow the general rule of what “Range: Self” is described as.