Originally Posted by
Mith
I guess my perspective is that the concept of "getting an objective second opinion" should be easily done. In the age of digital communication, I don't know why it cannot be possible to:
1) file a complaint with the relevant body
2) get an independent review from another specialist that can at least inform where there may be issues.
3) If there are signs of issues with the practitioner, call them in for a hearing.
I don't know if it is too risky to use a confidential clause and a recording device for such records that can be accessed as a "third party" to break the power imbalance of "professional vs. Client".