She would have demanded an explanation for why the rest of the Order associated with an evil halfling and why Durkon lied* about it.

If they could have come up with one that satisfied her (this sentence will prompt a multi-page battle or at least a lot of screaming), she would probably still have demanded Belkar be in chains for the trip back, and her opinion of Durkon's honesty would be lowered.

*"You'll see that not none o' us are evil." If the double negative was deliberate it was an act of intellectual dishonesty morally equivalent to a lie; if it wasn't then it was simply a lie. And Miko is unlikely to be impressed by wordplay.